Matches for from:punkman hash, 33 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Oct 26 08:11:51 UTC 2015 <punkman> hash of original 0.5.3 source perhaps
Sun Oct 26 22:35:56 UTC 2014 <punkman> hash must be smaller than 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364141
Tue Nov 04 02:09:57 UTC 2014 <punkman> deed/9ULZPc7yeZ9fQEA1aZ73H6mcv1s2C4gYFAbNTb5urovj << urovj , that deed hash
Tue Oct 28 06:51:56 UTC 2014 <punkman> if you base58decode the deed hash, you get a sha256 hash of raw deed
Tue Aug 25 20:18:53 UTC 2015 <punkman> mircea_popescu: how's the hash pow related to ec?
Sun Oct 04 17:53:53 UTC 2015 <punkman> https://blockchain.info/tx/fca843c0b40a1755eee073a719c856baa7fbf5ac28db84804a44a91f52638632 161 conf on the original hash?
Tue Sep 30 13:43:43 UTC 2014 <punkman> (by random I mean based on the bundle hash)
Sat Oct 11 13:52:22 UTC 2014 <punkman> I take the hash of each deed, concatenate those to create the "bundle", then hash the bundle and make a private key out of that
Mon Aug 24 08:42:38 UTC 2015 <punkman> jurov: I didn't put a hash in my detached sig filename though
Tue Sep 30 13:42:10 UTC 2014 <punkman> mircea_popescu: because it goes from file hash to pub address
Sun Oct 26 22:36:54 UTC 2014 <punkman> it's not a problem, just wait for next deed, hash changes
Tue Oct 28 06:51:24 UTC 2014 <punkman> that is a deed hash, the "lite" bundle is all the deed hashes
Mon Dec 01 14:59:23 UTC 2014 <punkman> also, do you see any benefit in including previous metablock hash in next metablock?
Mon Dec 08 23:33:56 UTC 2014 <punkman> so if you hash tx+something, that's not gonna happen
Sat Jun 14 12:11:18 UTC 2014 <punkman> and in the interest of not writing things twice, assbot could send each bundle hash here http://www.proofofexistence.com/developers
Sat Oct 11 13:49:02 UTC 2014 <punkman> for existing deedbot, the whole bundle goes through sha256, then that hash is manipulated to create a public address
Mon Dec 01 15:06:56 UTC 2014 <punkman> the service would notarize the fact that on X date, the contents were something that hashes to Y hash
Mon Dec 08 23:30:20 UTC 2014 <punkman> the R value thing, instead of using RNG, you can just hash tx+key or something like that.